Tuesday August 16, 2011
To be posted on Google.com
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Title : Part - 7 California Crimes, No Justice and Hanson Bridgett LLP
By Dr. Lino Dial
Subtitle : FRAUDS in Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291.
In any Story, Play or Movie, there are people involved.
The Persons, Players, and characters : The Cast :
1. Hanson Bridgett LLP
This is a Prominent Law Firm in San Francisco, California, one of the largest if not the largest Law firms with 150 Attorneys in the group at :
425 Market Street , 26th floor
San Francisco, CA 94105.
Tel. 415 - 995 - 5075
Tel. 415 - 777 - 3200
Tel. 877 - 342 - 6766 ( toll free ).
Their website : http://www.hansonbridgett.com
Hanson Bridgett LLP has offices in San Francisco, the North Bay,
Sacramento, Silicon Valley and East Bay.
According to their website, their clients include Multinational Fortune 500 Corporations, individuals, and Public Agencies in California.
The connection of Hanson Bridgett LLP to the 53 Crimes committed by
Physicians, Hospital and Lawyer in one hospital in Vallejo, California :
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is a senior partner in the Law firm of
Hanson Bridgett LLP. the connection of Attorney Schnier with the 53
Crimes in one Hospital in the City of Vallejo, California was discussed in
Parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of this series on California Crimes, No Justice which
was started on August 9, 2011.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is a California - licensed practicing Lawyer.
In Legal Proceedings or Judicial Hearings Attorney Schnier is an officer of
the Law or of the Court.
The Judicial System and Judicial Hearings and Court of Law are supposed
to be involved or in the business of truth or knowing the truth.
Without knowing the truth, there is no Justice. No Truth, No Justice.
In simple English :
How can you have Justice when people are lying or telling falsehoods ?
In Parts - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of this series,
I posted the lies, deceits, frauds and falsehoods of Attorney Schnier
during a Judicial Hearing held according to Law in California.
2. The second person , player or character : Mr. Charles D. Ramey.
In Part - 1 of this series I posted that Charles D. Ramey is a Government
Official, a Public employee, being paid by tax dollars of the people of
Solano County, California.
Mr. Ramey is employed by the Solano County Judicial system :
Executive Officer
Clerk of Court
Superior Court of California
County of Solano
Hall of Justice
600 Union Avenue
Fairfield, CA 94533
Tel. 707 - 421 - 7827
Fax. 707 - 421 - 7817
The comment posted on the website of Hanson Bridgett LLP about ten
days ago was asking for an explanation or comment from Mr. Charles Ramey
about the 53 crimes committed by Physicians in one hospital in Solano County
which is under the jurisdiction of Mr. Charles D. Ramey.
Mr. charles D. Ramey has a lot of explaining to do.
Specifically, Solano county Superior Court Case No. 87291.
Ten False declarations were made and submitted by Dr. Leonard Brant
in the Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291.
This case is about the 53 crimes committed by Hospital, Physicians and
Lawyer in one hospital in the city of Vallejo, California.
The evidences submitted in Superior Court Case No. 87291 are Frauds.
The evidences from the Hospital Peer Review Investigations and records
in a subsequent Judicial Hearing are Frauds.
These Frauds were accepted by the Superior Court of Solano County.
Please Note :
If the premise or evidence is false or fraud, Conslusion is Fraud.
The evidences submitted and accepted by Solano County Superior Court in
Case No. 87291 are false or frauds.
The Decision of the court in this case must be Fraud or false or invalid.
Mr. Charles D. Ramey has to explain in Public since this is about Public Justice.
Fraud on the court.
Reference : Go to Google.com
http://www.u.s.Legal.com/fraud-on-the-court
" Fraud on the court occurs when the Judicial Machinery itself has been
tainted, such as when an Attorney who is an officer of the court, is involved
in the perpetration of a fraud or makes material misrepresentation to the
court.
Fraud upon the court makes void the orders and judgments of that court."
( In this particular case, Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291. ).
In bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121( 10th Cir.1985),
the court stated :
" Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the Judicial Machinery
itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false
statements or perjury ...
It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence
is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function---
thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.
The Superior Court of Solano county is in the city of Fairfield which is only
about 15 to 20 miles from the city of Vallejo.
The significance of the Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291
is that it is the center or the heart of the 53 crimes in one hospital in the
City of Vallejo, California 94589.
This takes us to the third person or player or character:
3. The third person or character is Dr. Leonard A. Brant. He is a
California - licensed practicing physician. His specialty is Surgery and Urology.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant is involved in Solano County Superior Court Case
No. 87291.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant prepared and submitted ten ( 10 ) false or deceitful
declarations in Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291.
The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were the evidences used in case no. 87291.
These were submitted by the Law Offices of :
McNamara, Houston, Dodge, et al
1211 Newell Avenue, suite 200
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Tel. 415 - 939 - 5330.
The ten declarations of Dr. Leonard A. Brant are typewritten in 3 pages.
The ten declarations are all Frauds.
In the Superior Court of Solano County, Case No. 87291 ,
The ten declarations of Dr. Leonard A. Brant are :
1. Hospital Peer Review investigation.
The hospital Peer Review investigations are full of lies, deceits and frauds.
Reference :
Series of 53 Hospital Falsifications in
http://www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
One fraud should be enough.
2. Hospital Peer Review investigation.
The investigation itself was fraud.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant made false statements during the investigation.
Reference :
Series of 53 Hospital Falsifications.
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial
One fraud is enough.
3. Hospital Peer Review investigation.
Dr. Brant talks about a Medical Report on a patient. this is fraud.
The report is fraud.
The patient was not in the hospital at the time of investigation.
The patient was already dead for a year before the Peer Review
investigation.
How can a Doctor make a report on a patient who was not in the hospital ?
Can a Doctor hospitalize a man who had been dead for a year ?
That doctor's report is a fraud.
One fraud is enough.
Reference :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
4. Dr. Brant talks of fraudulent investigation.
Reference :
www.Facebook.com/LinoDial
One fraud is enough.
5. Dr. Brant talks more about the frauds during the Peer Review
investigations.
Reference:
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
One fraud is enough.
6. Dr. Brant's fraud.
Dr. Brant did not mention the 53 crimes or frauds committed during the
Judicial Review Hearing.
One fraud is enough.
Reference :
www.yahoomail.com/LinoDial
7. Dr. Brant states that the Judicial Hearing was held.
Dr. Brant did not mention that 53 frauds were committed during that
Judicial Hearing.
One fraud is enough.
Reference :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
8. Dr. Brant declares a fraudulent decision in the hospital.
One fraud is enough.
Reference :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
9. Dr. Brant declares the fraud in the hospital Peer Review investigation.
One fraud is enough.
Reference :
53 Crimes committed at the hospital.
www.Twitter.com/LinoDial
10. Dr. Brant talks about the Judicial Hearing where 53 frauds were done.
One fraud is enough.
References :
Series of 53 Hospital Falsifications.
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Conclusion :
The evidences presented by Dr. Leonard A. Brant in Solano County
Superior Court Case No. 87291 are lies, deceits, falsehoods and frauds.
The decision made by the Solano County Superior Court regarding
Case No. 87291 is false, fraudulent and invalid.
The explanation of Mr. Charles D. Ramey about this case must be made
public. This is about Public Justice.
References :
Fraud on the Court
http://www.U.S.Legal.com
Series of 53 Intentional Falsifications in one hospital in Vallejo, California
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
The End.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Monday, August 15, 2011
Part - 6 California Crimes, No Justice, Hanson Bridgett LLP
Monday August 15, 2011
To be posted in Google.com
Title : Part - 6 California Crimes, No Justice and Hanson Bridgett LLP
by Dr. Lino Dial.
Arguments for Criminal Action and Investigation.
In Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of California Crimes, No Justice and Hanson Bridgett LLP I had established the connection between the prominent
San Francisco Law firm and 53 Crimes in one Hospital in Vallejo, CA 94589.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is the senior partner of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
Perhaps a Question and answer method is appropriate at this time.
1. Question ( Q ) : Was Attorney Schnier at the scene or place of crime ?
2. Answer ( A ) : Yes.
3. Q : What was the place of crimes ?
4. A : Inside the Judicial Review Hearing held according to Law in Calif.
5. Q : What is the evidence that Attorney Steven V. Schnier was there ?
6. A : The 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
The transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing was prepared and produced
by the official court transcriber from Oakland, California.
There were nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians who were
present at that Judicial Review Hearing. These doctors are eyewitnesses
to the lies, deceits, frauds and falsehoods of Attorney Steven Schnier.
The name of Attorney Steven V. Schnier is all over the transcript.
The Physicians were notified or given notices to come to the Judicial Review
Hearing and they came.
The Physicians are reliable witnesses. The Judicial Review Hearing was
held for three hours. The Official Court transcriber charged good money
in preparing and producing the 100 - page transcript.
After the Judicial Review Hearing, the Hospital and doctors claimed in
writing that the hearing never took place; that it was canceled.
Please note :
1. The claim that it was canceled is Fraud.
2. To claim that is was canceled is : Obstruction of Justice.
3. They named a person who canceled it. This is a very Big Fraud.
No investigation by the Dept. of Justice.
7. Q : Who was in charge at the Judicial Review Hearing ?
8. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
9. Q : Who was the Hospital attorney ?
10. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
11. Q : Who presented the patients and their Hospital medical records ?
12. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
13. Q : Who decided to put Physician-witnesses under oath on witness stand
stand ?
14. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
15. Q : Did Dr. Peter E. Philbin testify ?
16. A : Yes. Dr. Peter E. Philbin testified under oath on the witness stand.
He was seen and heard by nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing doctors.
17. Q : Did Dr. Peter E. Philbin tell the truth ?
18. A : No. Dr. Philbin told lies, deceits, and falsehoods while under oath
on the witness stand and his statements were instantly recorded in the
transcript by the official court transcriber.
This indicates Perjury , instantly recorded in the transcript of the hearing.
19. Q : Did Dr. Leonard A. Brant testify ?
20. A : Yes. Dr. Leonard A. Brant testified under oath on the witness stand
during the Judicial Review Hearing. He was seen and heard by nine ( 9 )
California - licensed practicing physicians.
21. Q : Did Dr. Leonard A. Brant tell the truth ?
22. A : No. Dr. Leonard A. Brant told lies, deceits and falsehoods while
he was under oath on the witness stand and his statements were
instantly recorded in the 100 - page transcript of the hearing.
This indicates another count of Perjury that was instantly recorded.
23. Q : What were the documents presented by Mr. Schnier at the hearing ?
24. A : The documents presented by Mr. Schnier were hospital patient
medical records with questions and allegations.
The questions and allegations about the patients were the result of a
Peer Review and hospital investigation which took place about one year
before the Judicial Review Hearing.
The Judicial Review Hearing was requested and was granted by the
Hospital according to the provisions of the Hospital bylaws.
25. Q : How long was the preparation for the Judicial Review Hearing ?
26. A : About six months to one year.
The Judicial Review Hearing was granted by the Hospital within Ten days
after it was requested.
The presentation and the documents to be presented were prepared
by the Medical Staff Executive committee composed of the President, the
Vice President, Secretary and various physicians who were chairmen or
head of the different departments in the hospital like Dept. of Medicine,
Dept. of Surgery, etc.
27. Q : Why was the Peer Review important ?
28. A : The Peer Review and hospital investigations, the result and all that
transpired during that so - called investigation was used as the basis or
material evidence for the Judicial Review Hearing.
29. Q : what were the questions and allegations asked during the Peer
Review and hospital investigations ?
30. A : The questions and allegations and hospital patient medical records
were the same during the Peer Review and during the Judicial Hearing.
These were listed, enumerated, typewritten and submitted and accepted
as evidence during the Judicial Review Hearing.
31. Q : Any difference in the questions and allegations ?
32. A : As I said the questions and allegations and answers were the same.
33. Q : What is the difference then ?
34. A : The questions and allegations and answers during the Peer Review
were made in the ordinary sense but during the Judicial Review Hearing,
these were made under oath during a Judicial or Legal proceeding.
Perjury and conspiracy now come into play.
35. Q : Were the questions and allegations proven ?
36. A : Yes. The questions and allegations during the Peer Review were
proven to be False beyond any reasonable doubt.
37. Q : What is difficult to understand ?
38. A : It is difficult to understand why Attorney Steven V. Schnier
would present the same questions and allegations at the Judicial
Review Hearing knowing that the answers to these questions and
allegations were already proven to be F a l s e .
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is an officer of the Law and supposed to
tell the truth at the hearing.
The questions and allegations prepared and presented by Attorney
Schnier were already proven False.
Note :
Preparing false evidence or paper is a crime.
References :
The Crime :
Making or filing a false accusation against any person is against the Law.
What Law is violated ?
California Criminal or Penal Code
Title 7 : Of Crimes against Public Justice.
Chapter 6 : Falsifying evidence.
Section 134 : Preparing false documentary evidence.
Every person guilty of preparing any false paper or record or thing,
with intent to produce it or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or
or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any ;proceeding authorized
by Law, is guilty of Felony.
Note : The false documents were presented at the Judicial Review Hearing
which was authorized by California Law.
Conspiracy : Violation of Federal Civil Rights Act Title 18 Section 241.
If two or more persons conspire to injure , oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him by the Constitution or Laws of the United States or
because of his having so exercised the same.
Lino Dial is a citizen of the United States and formerly on active duty
in the U.S. Navy.
The End.
To be posted in Google.com
Title : Part - 6 California Crimes, No Justice and Hanson Bridgett LLP
by Dr. Lino Dial.
Arguments for Criminal Action and Investigation.
In Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of California Crimes, No Justice and Hanson Bridgett LLP I had established the connection between the prominent
San Francisco Law firm and 53 Crimes in one Hospital in Vallejo, CA 94589.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is the senior partner of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
Perhaps a Question and answer method is appropriate at this time.
1. Question ( Q ) : Was Attorney Schnier at the scene or place of crime ?
2. Answer ( A ) : Yes.
3. Q : What was the place of crimes ?
4. A : Inside the Judicial Review Hearing held according to Law in Calif.
5. Q : What is the evidence that Attorney Steven V. Schnier was there ?
6. A : The 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
The transcript of the Judicial Review Hearing was prepared and produced
by the official court transcriber from Oakland, California.
There were nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians who were
present at that Judicial Review Hearing. These doctors are eyewitnesses
to the lies, deceits, frauds and falsehoods of Attorney Steven Schnier.
The name of Attorney Steven V. Schnier is all over the transcript.
The Physicians were notified or given notices to come to the Judicial Review
Hearing and they came.
The Physicians are reliable witnesses. The Judicial Review Hearing was
held for three hours. The Official Court transcriber charged good money
in preparing and producing the 100 - page transcript.
After the Judicial Review Hearing, the Hospital and doctors claimed in
writing that the hearing never took place; that it was canceled.
Please note :
1. The claim that it was canceled is Fraud.
2. To claim that is was canceled is : Obstruction of Justice.
3. They named a person who canceled it. This is a very Big Fraud.
No investigation by the Dept. of Justice.
7. Q : Who was in charge at the Judicial Review Hearing ?
8. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
9. Q : Who was the Hospital attorney ?
10. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
11. Q : Who presented the patients and their Hospital medical records ?
12. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
13. Q : Who decided to put Physician-witnesses under oath on witness stand
stand ?
14. A : Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
15. Q : Did Dr. Peter E. Philbin testify ?
16. A : Yes. Dr. Peter E. Philbin testified under oath on the witness stand.
He was seen and heard by nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing doctors.
17. Q : Did Dr. Peter E. Philbin tell the truth ?
18. A : No. Dr. Philbin told lies, deceits, and falsehoods while under oath
on the witness stand and his statements were instantly recorded in the
transcript by the official court transcriber.
This indicates Perjury , instantly recorded in the transcript of the hearing.
19. Q : Did Dr. Leonard A. Brant testify ?
20. A : Yes. Dr. Leonard A. Brant testified under oath on the witness stand
during the Judicial Review Hearing. He was seen and heard by nine ( 9 )
California - licensed practicing physicians.
21. Q : Did Dr. Leonard A. Brant tell the truth ?
22. A : No. Dr. Leonard A. Brant told lies, deceits and falsehoods while
he was under oath on the witness stand and his statements were
instantly recorded in the 100 - page transcript of the hearing.
This indicates another count of Perjury that was instantly recorded.
23. Q : What were the documents presented by Mr. Schnier at the hearing ?
24. A : The documents presented by Mr. Schnier were hospital patient
medical records with questions and allegations.
The questions and allegations about the patients were the result of a
Peer Review and hospital investigation which took place about one year
before the Judicial Review Hearing.
The Judicial Review Hearing was requested and was granted by the
Hospital according to the provisions of the Hospital bylaws.
25. Q : How long was the preparation for the Judicial Review Hearing ?
26. A : About six months to one year.
The Judicial Review Hearing was granted by the Hospital within Ten days
after it was requested.
The presentation and the documents to be presented were prepared
by the Medical Staff Executive committee composed of the President, the
Vice President, Secretary and various physicians who were chairmen or
head of the different departments in the hospital like Dept. of Medicine,
Dept. of Surgery, etc.
27. Q : Why was the Peer Review important ?
28. A : The Peer Review and hospital investigations, the result and all that
transpired during that so - called investigation was used as the basis or
material evidence for the Judicial Review Hearing.
29. Q : what were the questions and allegations asked during the Peer
Review and hospital investigations ?
30. A : The questions and allegations and hospital patient medical records
were the same during the Peer Review and during the Judicial Hearing.
These were listed, enumerated, typewritten and submitted and accepted
as evidence during the Judicial Review Hearing.
31. Q : Any difference in the questions and allegations ?
32. A : As I said the questions and allegations and answers were the same.
33. Q : What is the difference then ?
34. A : The questions and allegations and answers during the Peer Review
were made in the ordinary sense but during the Judicial Review Hearing,
these were made under oath during a Judicial or Legal proceeding.
Perjury and conspiracy now come into play.
35. Q : Were the questions and allegations proven ?
36. A : Yes. The questions and allegations during the Peer Review were
proven to be False beyond any reasonable doubt.
37. Q : What is difficult to understand ?
38. A : It is difficult to understand why Attorney Steven V. Schnier
would present the same questions and allegations at the Judicial
Review Hearing knowing that the answers to these questions and
allegations were already proven to be F a l s e .
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is an officer of the Law and supposed to
tell the truth at the hearing.
The questions and allegations prepared and presented by Attorney
Schnier were already proven False.
Note :
Preparing false evidence or paper is a crime.
References :
The Crime :
Making or filing a false accusation against any person is against the Law.
What Law is violated ?
California Criminal or Penal Code
Title 7 : Of Crimes against Public Justice.
Chapter 6 : Falsifying evidence.
Section 134 : Preparing false documentary evidence.
Every person guilty of preparing any false paper or record or thing,
with intent to produce it or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or
or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any ;proceeding authorized
by Law, is guilty of Felony.
Note : The false documents were presented at the Judicial Review Hearing
which was authorized by California Law.
Conspiracy : Violation of Federal Civil Rights Act Title 18 Section 241.
If two or more persons conspire to injure , oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or
privilege secured to him by the Constitution or Laws of the United States or
because of his having so exercised the same.
Lino Dial is a citizen of the United States and formerly on active duty
in the U.S. Navy.
The End.
Thursday, August 11, 2011
No Justice in California by Dr. Lino Dial Part - 3
August 11, 2011 Thursday
To be posted today on :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Title : No Justice in California Part - 3 By Dr. Lino Dial
Summary of No Justice in California Part - 1 :
1. This all started with a comment on the website of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
2. The comment in the Law firm of Hanson Bridgett stated that :
" It is fair that Charles D. Ramey explain or comment on the accusations of
crimes committed by Hospital, Physicians, Lawyer in one Hospital in the
city of Vallejo, California... "
3. Charles D. Ramey is the Executive Officer and Clerk of Court of the
Solano County Superior Court. The 53 Crimes were committed in the
city of Vallejo which is in Solano County, California.
4. The connection between the Law firm of Hanson Bridgett LLP to the
topic : No Justice in California was established because
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is a senior partner of this Law firm.
5. Ten deceitful and false declarations were made by Dr. Leonard A. Brant
in Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291.
The case is about the 53 crimes in one Hospital in Vallejo, California.
The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were proven false beyond any reasonable
doubt. These declarations were submitted by the Law firm of :
McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure et al
Attorneys at Law
1211 Newell Avenue, second floor
P.O. Box 5288
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel. 415 - 939 - 5330.
Summary of No Justice in California Part - 2.
1. The connection between the topic :
No Justice in California Parts 1 and 2 with the Law firm of Hanson
Bridgett LLP of San Francisco has been established because
Attorney Steven V. Schnier, ESQ is a senior partner of this Law firm at :
425 Market Street, 26 th floor
San Francisco, California 94105.
Tel. 415 - 777 - 3200
Tel. 877 - 342 - 6766 ( toll free ).
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
2. Intentional Falsification by Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D. under oath on the
witness stand during the Judicial Hearing was documented.
3. Intentional Falsifications by Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D. under oath on
the witness stand during the Judicial Hearing was documented.
4. Intentional Falsifications, Lies, Deceits, Falsifications, falsehoods and
Frauds by Attorney Steven V. Schnier during the Judicial Hearing was
presented and documented. These are on :
page 8 Line 26
page 9 Line 1
page 66 Lines 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 26 of the 100 - page transcript of hearing.
No Justice in California Part 3 By Dr. Lino Dial.
In Parts 1 and 2 of No Justice in California, I mentioned the link or
connection of Hanson Bridgett LLP to the 53 Crimes committed by
Hospital, Physicians, and Lawyer during a Judicial Hearing held according
to Law in the city of Vallejo, California.
The senior partner of Hanson Bridgett LLP is Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
Attorney Schnier was the person in charge of the Judicial Hearing.
Mr. Schnier presented the two Physician - witnesses :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D., a Nephrologist
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D., a Surgeon.
Mr. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney.
Mr. Schnier prepared and submitted at the hearing the items to be discussed,
much like an agenda.
I said previously that the Judicial Hearing was full of lies, deceits, frauds
and falsehoods.
I already mentioned the intentional falsifications of Dr. Philbin and
Dr. Brant which they presented under oath on the witness stand during the
Judicial Hearing. These are documented in the 100 - page transcript.
The lies, deceits, falsehoods and frauds committed by Attorney
Steven V. Schnier were also documented in the transcript of the hearing.
Another example of glaring, sickening, disgusting and despicable evidence
presented by Attorney Steven V. Schnier during the Judicial Hearing :
A patient was supposedly admitted by Dr. Lino Dial to the hospital.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that the hospitalization of this patient was
reviewed by a Physician during a Peer Review as stated in the transcript.
Attorney Schnier also stated that this patient was not only reviewed by
the Physician but the Doctor also made a Medical Report.
Here is the smoking gun :
The patient was already DEAD for about a year before the so-called
hospitalization.
Questions :
1. How could this patient be admitted to the hospital when he had
been dead for a year ? He was in the cemetery , DEAD. This is Fraud.
2. Another fraud :
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that during the hospitalization,
this patient was reviewed by a Physician.
How can the Physician review this patient who was not even in the hospital
during the Peer Review period ? Patient was in the cemetery and DEAD.
3. Another Fraud :
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that the Physician who reviewed the
said patient made a Medical Report.
That medical report must be Fraud.
The patient was Not in the Hospital. He died a year earlier.
This is recorded in the 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
To be continued. Part 4 is next.
The End.
To be posted today on :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Title : No Justice in California Part - 3 By Dr. Lino Dial
Summary of No Justice in California Part - 1 :
1. This all started with a comment on the website of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
2. The comment in the Law firm of Hanson Bridgett stated that :
" It is fair that Charles D. Ramey explain or comment on the accusations of
crimes committed by Hospital, Physicians, Lawyer in one Hospital in the
city of Vallejo, California... "
3. Charles D. Ramey is the Executive Officer and Clerk of Court of the
Solano County Superior Court. The 53 Crimes were committed in the
city of Vallejo which is in Solano County, California.
4. The connection between the Law firm of Hanson Bridgett LLP to the
topic : No Justice in California was established because
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is a senior partner of this Law firm.
5. Ten deceitful and false declarations were made by Dr. Leonard A. Brant
in Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291.
The case is about the 53 crimes in one Hospital in Vallejo, California.
The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were proven false beyond any reasonable
doubt. These declarations were submitted by the Law firm of :
McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure et al
Attorneys at Law
1211 Newell Avenue, second floor
P.O. Box 5288
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel. 415 - 939 - 5330.
Summary of No Justice in California Part - 2.
1. The connection between the topic :
No Justice in California Parts 1 and 2 with the Law firm of Hanson
Bridgett LLP of San Francisco has been established because
Attorney Steven V. Schnier, ESQ is a senior partner of this Law firm at :
425 Market Street, 26 th floor
San Francisco, California 94105.
Tel. 415 - 777 - 3200
Tel. 877 - 342 - 6766 ( toll free ).
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
2. Intentional Falsification by Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D. under oath on the
witness stand during the Judicial Hearing was documented.
3. Intentional Falsifications by Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D. under oath on
the witness stand during the Judicial Hearing was documented.
4. Intentional Falsifications, Lies, Deceits, Falsifications, falsehoods and
Frauds by Attorney Steven V. Schnier during the Judicial Hearing was
presented and documented. These are on :
page 8 Line 26
page 9 Line 1
page 66 Lines 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 26 of the 100 - page transcript of hearing.
No Justice in California Part 3 By Dr. Lino Dial.
In Parts 1 and 2 of No Justice in California, I mentioned the link or
connection of Hanson Bridgett LLP to the 53 Crimes committed by
Hospital, Physicians, and Lawyer during a Judicial Hearing held according
to Law in the city of Vallejo, California.
The senior partner of Hanson Bridgett LLP is Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
Attorney Schnier was the person in charge of the Judicial Hearing.
Mr. Schnier presented the two Physician - witnesses :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D., a Nephrologist
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D., a Surgeon.
Mr. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney.
Mr. Schnier prepared and submitted at the hearing the items to be discussed,
much like an agenda.
I said previously that the Judicial Hearing was full of lies, deceits, frauds
and falsehoods.
I already mentioned the intentional falsifications of Dr. Philbin and
Dr. Brant which they presented under oath on the witness stand during the
Judicial Hearing. These are documented in the 100 - page transcript.
The lies, deceits, falsehoods and frauds committed by Attorney
Steven V. Schnier were also documented in the transcript of the hearing.
Another example of glaring, sickening, disgusting and despicable evidence
presented by Attorney Steven V. Schnier during the Judicial Hearing :
A patient was supposedly admitted by Dr. Lino Dial to the hospital.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that the hospitalization of this patient was
reviewed by a Physician during a Peer Review as stated in the transcript.
Attorney Schnier also stated that this patient was not only reviewed by
the Physician but the Doctor also made a Medical Report.
Here is the smoking gun :
The patient was already DEAD for about a year before the so-called
hospitalization.
Questions :
1. How could this patient be admitted to the hospital when he had
been dead for a year ? He was in the cemetery , DEAD. This is Fraud.
2. Another fraud :
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that during the hospitalization,
this patient was reviewed by a Physician.
How can the Physician review this patient who was not even in the hospital
during the Peer Review period ? Patient was in the cemetery and DEAD.
3. Another Fraud :
Attorney Steven V. Schnier said that the Physician who reviewed the
said patient made a Medical Report.
That medical report must be Fraud.
The patient was Not in the Hospital. He died a year earlier.
This is recorded in the 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
To be continued. Part 4 is next.
The End.
Tuesday, August 9, 2011
No Justice in California
August 9, 2011
No Justice in California
By Dr. Lino Dial
Last week I went to Google.com to check on the 53 Crimes in one Hospital in
the city of Vallejo, California 94589. This is found in :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
I came across a comment under HANSON BRIDGETT LLP, probably the
largest Law Firm in San Francisco, California with about 150 lawyers in the
group or members of the Law Firm located at :
425 Market Street 26th floor
San Francisco, CA 94105.
Tel. 415 - 777 - 3200
877 - 342 - 6766 ( toll free )
Fax. 415 - 541 - 9366
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
Their website was updated on July 12, 2011
under FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters Business.
The comment :
" It is fair that Charles D. Ramey comment or explain the accusations against
Physicians in Solano County California ..."
There was no mention as to who made the comment and I could not access
or find it under HANSON BRIDGETT LLP.
Who is Charles D. Ramey ?
The person who posted the comment about the 53 Crimes in one Hospital
in the city of Vallejo, California is probably concerned and rightly so.
Usually one or two crimes of Fraud is enough for a Doctor to lose his or her
Medical license but three or Ten well - documented crimes witnessed by
nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians are very serious.
53 Crimes is like the Atomic bomb dropped in the city of Nagasaki, Japan
on this date in 1945.
A comment or explanation from Charles D. Ramey is requested.
The position of Charles D. Ramey :
Executive Officer
Clerk of Court
Superior Court of California
County of Solano
Hall of Justice
600 Union Avenue
Fairfield, CA 94533
Phone 707 - 421 - 7827
Fax. 707 - 421 - 7817
The role of Charles D. Ramey :
He is concerned with issues related to proceedings conducted in the
Courts of Solano County. One such proceeding is Case No. 87291.
Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291 is about the 53 Crimes
committed by Hospital, Physicians and Lawyer. This was covered up.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant is a Surgeon specilizing in Kidney diseases.
Dr. Brant made Ten declarations in Solano County Superior Court in
Case No. 87291. The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were typewritten in
three pages. These ten declarations are all false.
The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were made under oath.
These were prepared and submitted in Solano County Superior Court
by the Law firm of :
McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure et al
Attorneys at Law
1211 Newell Avenue, second floor
P.O. Box 5288
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel. 415 - 939 - 5330
Fax. 415 - 939 - 0203
Questions :
1. Why would Dr. Leonard A. Brant submit Ten false declarations in the
Solano County Superior Court ?
2. Why was the main issue not discussed in Superior Court of Solano County
Case No. 87291 ?
The connection with HANSON BRIDGETT LLP is probably because
the Senior partner in that Law firm is Steven V. Schnier, ESQ.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is listed as senior partner in the website of
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Anybody can find this by going to Google.com first then type :
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
This is listed under FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters Business.
The website is updated July 12, 2011.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier committed or made many or numerous Lies,
deceits and falsehoods during a Judicial Hearing conducted according to Law
in the city of Vallejo, California.
If the Judicial Hearing is a play or a movie, Attorney Steven V. Schnier
is the Producer or Director or the person in charge.
Two California - licensed practicing physicians were selected as witnesses
during the Judicial Hearing :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, an internist and Nephrologist.
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, a Surgeon involving Kidney Diseases.
During the Judicial Hearing these two witnesses committed crimes :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D. told lies while under oath on the witness stand
during the Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney and he was the one
who asked the questions.
The Lies and falsehoods of Dr. Philbin were recorded instantly by the
official court transcriber and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript
of that Judicial Hearing.
These are on page 43 Lines 20 - 21 of the 100 - page transcript.
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D. told Lies while under oath on the witness
stand during the Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney and he was the one
who asked questions.
The Lies and falsehoods of Dr. Brant were recorded instantly by the
official court transcriber and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript
of that Judicial Hearing.
These are on page 84 Lines 23 - 25 of the 100 - page transcript.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney.
During the Judicial Hearing which lasted for three hours, Mr. Schnier did
most of the talking and asked most of the questions as noted in the
100 - page transcript of that hearing.
There is a saying that : A fish is caught in its mouth.
The more a person talks, the more he makes mistakes.
The Lies and falsehoods of Attorney Steven V. Schnier were recorded
instantly and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
The spoken words or actions of Attorney Steven V. Schnier are on :
page 8 Line 26
page 9 Line 1
page 66 Lines 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 26 of the 100 - page transcript.
After the Judicial Hearing, the Hospital and Doctors claimed in writing that
the Judicial Hearing never took place.
The claim of the Hospital and Doctors is impossible because the Judicial
Hearing was actually held. The evidences that it was held :
1. First of all, the hearing was conducted according to Law.
2. The hearing was held for three hours.
3. There were nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians who
were present at that hearing. They are eyewitnesses to everything that
took place during the hearing.
They saw when Dr. Peter E. Philbin took the oath to tell the Truth on the witness stand. They heard Dr. Philbin when he told lies and falsehoods on
the witness stand and these are recorded in the 100 - page transcript.
They saw when Dr. Leonard A. Brant took the oath to tell the Truth on
the witness stand. They heard Dr. Brant when he told lies and falsehoods
on the witness stand and these are recorded in the 100 - page transcript
of that hearing.
This is also true of Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
The nine California physicians saw Mr. Schnier. He was the Star of the show.
Attorney Schnier collected and received all the documents presented by
the hospital.
Attorney Schnier most likely was the one who prepared the documents
because he was the Hospital Attorney.
Attorney Schnier submitted those so - called evidences during the
Judicial Hearing.
The problem is those evidences were false.
It is a crime to prepare and submit false documents in a Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Schnier knows that. His credentials are impressive.
Attorney Schnier is a senior partner in the law firm of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
Sometimes it is listed as : Bridgett, Vlahos, Schnier.
From their website it shows this :
Practice areas of Attorney Schnier :
Health Care; Healthcare litigation.
Tel. 415 - 995 -5018
Fax. 415 - 541 - 9366
his e-mail : sschnier@hansonbridgett.com
He specializes in advising Hospitals, Medical Staffs, Physicians Medical
Staff service professionals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers,
Physician Groups, and other Healthcare organizations.
Attorney Schnier was previously President of the California Society of
Healthcare Lawyers.
Member, American Health Lawyers Association,
Vice Chairman of its Medical Staff, Credentialing, and
Peer Review Practice Group.
Honors: Best Lawyers in America ( 1995 - 2011 ).
Northern California Super Lawyers ( 2006 - 2011 ).
Education :
Attorney Schnier is a graduate of Stanford University Law School ( 1972 ).
Graduate Studies : London School of Economics and Political Science.
B.S. University of California ( 1967 ).
Going back to the comment posted under Hanson Bridgett LLP :
1. Mr. Charles D. Ramey the Executive Officer and Clerk of the Court of
Solano County Superior Court in Fairfield, CA should answer questions
especially about Superior Court Case No. 87291.
2. Attorney Steven V. Schnier, ESQ of San Francisco should answer
or be given a chance to tell in Public his side of the story, preferably
in a Court of Law especially because the evidences used in the
Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291 came from the Judicial
Hearing where he was the Hospital Attorney and that he was in charge.
It is also well - documented that Attorney Schnier told most of the Lies,
deceits and falsehoods in that Judicial Hearing.
Submitted by :
Dr. Lino Dial.
My e-mail : LinoADial2001@yahoo.com
also : LinoDial@gmail.com
No Justice in California
By Dr. Lino Dial
Last week I went to Google.com to check on the 53 Crimes in one Hospital in
the city of Vallejo, California 94589. This is found in :
www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
I came across a comment under HANSON BRIDGETT LLP, probably the
largest Law Firm in San Francisco, California with about 150 lawyers in the
group or members of the Law Firm located at :
425 Market Street 26th floor
San Francisco, CA 94105.
Tel. 415 - 777 - 3200
877 - 342 - 6766 ( toll free )
Fax. 415 - 541 - 9366
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
Their website was updated on July 12, 2011
under FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters Business.
The comment :
" It is fair that Charles D. Ramey comment or explain the accusations against
Physicians in Solano County California ..."
There was no mention as to who made the comment and I could not access
or find it under HANSON BRIDGETT LLP.
Who is Charles D. Ramey ?
The person who posted the comment about the 53 Crimes in one Hospital
in the city of Vallejo, California is probably concerned and rightly so.
Usually one or two crimes of Fraud is enough for a Doctor to lose his or her
Medical license but three or Ten well - documented crimes witnessed by
nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians are very serious.
53 Crimes is like the Atomic bomb dropped in the city of Nagasaki, Japan
on this date in 1945.
A comment or explanation from Charles D. Ramey is requested.
The position of Charles D. Ramey :
Executive Officer
Clerk of Court
Superior Court of California
County of Solano
Hall of Justice
600 Union Avenue
Fairfield, CA 94533
Phone 707 - 421 - 7827
Fax. 707 - 421 - 7817
The role of Charles D. Ramey :
He is concerned with issues related to proceedings conducted in the
Courts of Solano County. One such proceeding is Case No. 87291.
Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291 is about the 53 Crimes
committed by Hospital, Physicians and Lawyer. This was covered up.
Dr. Leonard A. Brant is a Surgeon specilizing in Kidney diseases.
Dr. Brant made Ten declarations in Solano County Superior Court in
Case No. 87291. The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were typewritten in
three pages. These ten declarations are all false.
The ten declarations of Dr. Brant were made under oath.
These were prepared and submitted in Solano County Superior Court
by the Law firm of :
McNamara, Houston, Dodge, McClure et al
Attorneys at Law
1211 Newell Avenue, second floor
P.O. Box 5288
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Tel. 415 - 939 - 5330
Fax. 415 - 939 - 0203
Questions :
1. Why would Dr. Leonard A. Brant submit Ten false declarations in the
Solano County Superior Court ?
2. Why was the main issue not discussed in Superior Court of Solano County
Case No. 87291 ?
The connection with HANSON BRIDGETT LLP is probably because
the Senior partner in that Law firm is Steven V. Schnier, ESQ.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier is listed as senior partner in the website of
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Anybody can find this by going to Google.com first then type :
http://www.hansonbridgett.com
This is listed under FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters Business.
The website is updated July 12, 2011.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier committed or made many or numerous Lies,
deceits and falsehoods during a Judicial Hearing conducted according to Law
in the city of Vallejo, California.
If the Judicial Hearing is a play or a movie, Attorney Steven V. Schnier
is the Producer or Director or the person in charge.
Two California - licensed practicing physicians were selected as witnesses
during the Judicial Hearing :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, an internist and Nephrologist.
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, a Surgeon involving Kidney Diseases.
During the Judicial Hearing these two witnesses committed crimes :
1. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D. told lies while under oath on the witness stand
during the Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney and he was the one
who asked the questions.
The Lies and falsehoods of Dr. Philbin were recorded instantly by the
official court transcriber and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript
of that Judicial Hearing.
These are on page 43 Lines 20 - 21 of the 100 - page transcript.
2. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D. told Lies while under oath on the witness
stand during the Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney and he was the one
who asked questions.
The Lies and falsehoods of Dr. Brant were recorded instantly by the
official court transcriber and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript
of that Judicial Hearing.
These are on page 84 Lines 23 - 25 of the 100 - page transcript.
Attorney Steven V. Schnier was the Hospital Attorney.
During the Judicial Hearing which lasted for three hours, Mr. Schnier did
most of the talking and asked most of the questions as noted in the
100 - page transcript of that hearing.
There is a saying that : A fish is caught in its mouth.
The more a person talks, the more he makes mistakes.
The Lies and falsehoods of Attorney Steven V. Schnier were recorded
instantly and well - preserved in the 100 - page transcript of that hearing.
The spoken words or actions of Attorney Steven V. Schnier are on :
page 8 Line 26
page 9 Line 1
page 66 Lines 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 25, 26 of the 100 - page transcript.
After the Judicial Hearing, the Hospital and Doctors claimed in writing that
the Judicial Hearing never took place.
The claim of the Hospital and Doctors is impossible because the Judicial
Hearing was actually held. The evidences that it was held :
1. First of all, the hearing was conducted according to Law.
2. The hearing was held for three hours.
3. There were nine ( 9 ) California - licensed practicing physicians who
were present at that hearing. They are eyewitnesses to everything that
took place during the hearing.
They saw when Dr. Peter E. Philbin took the oath to tell the Truth on the witness stand. They heard Dr. Philbin when he told lies and falsehoods on
the witness stand and these are recorded in the 100 - page transcript.
They saw when Dr. Leonard A. Brant took the oath to tell the Truth on
the witness stand. They heard Dr. Brant when he told lies and falsehoods
on the witness stand and these are recorded in the 100 - page transcript
of that hearing.
This is also true of Attorney Steven V. Schnier.
The nine California physicians saw Mr. Schnier. He was the Star of the show.
Attorney Schnier collected and received all the documents presented by
the hospital.
Attorney Schnier most likely was the one who prepared the documents
because he was the Hospital Attorney.
Attorney Schnier submitted those so - called evidences during the
Judicial Hearing.
The problem is those evidences were false.
It is a crime to prepare and submit false documents in a Judicial Hearing.
Attorney Schnier knows that. His credentials are impressive.
Attorney Schnier is a senior partner in the law firm of Hanson Bridgett LLP.
Sometimes it is listed as : Bridgett, Vlahos, Schnier.
From their website it shows this :
Practice areas of Attorney Schnier :
Health Care; Healthcare litigation.
Tel. 415 - 995 -5018
Fax. 415 - 541 - 9366
his e-mail : sschnier@hansonbridgett.com
He specializes in advising Hospitals, Medical Staffs, Physicians Medical
Staff service professionals, Ambulatory Surgery Centers,
Physician Groups, and other Healthcare organizations.
Attorney Schnier was previously President of the California Society of
Healthcare Lawyers.
Member, American Health Lawyers Association,
Vice Chairman of its Medical Staff, Credentialing, and
Peer Review Practice Group.
Honors: Best Lawyers in America ( 1995 - 2011 ).
Northern California Super Lawyers ( 2006 - 2011 ).
Education :
Attorney Schnier is a graduate of Stanford University Law School ( 1972 ).
Graduate Studies : London School of Economics and Political Science.
B.S. University of California ( 1967 ).
Going back to the comment posted under Hanson Bridgett LLP :
1. Mr. Charles D. Ramey the Executive Officer and Clerk of the Court of
Solano County Superior Court in Fairfield, CA should answer questions
especially about Superior Court Case No. 87291.
2. Attorney Steven V. Schnier, ESQ of San Francisco should answer
or be given a chance to tell in Public his side of the story, preferably
in a Court of Law especially because the evidences used in the
Solano County Superior Court Case No. 87291 came from the Judicial
Hearing where he was the Hospital Attorney and that he was in charge.
It is also well - documented that Attorney Schnier told most of the Lies,
deceits and falsehoods in that Judicial Hearing.
Submitted by :
Dr. Lino Dial.
My e-mail : LinoADial2001@yahoo.com
also : LinoDial@gmail.com
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
California Crimes: California Crimes
California Crimes: California Crimes: "July 28, 2010 California Crimes ..."
California Crimes
July 28, 2010
California Crimes
By Dr. Lino Dial
This is an eye-witness or first - hand report.
Persons who committed the crimes :
1. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D.
Urologist.
Urological Associates Medical Group of San Francisco, CA.
3637 California Street,
San Francisco, CA 94118
2. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D.
Public Health, Internal Medicine, Nephrology
Sonoma Development Center
15000 Arnold Drive,
Sonoma, CA 95476
3. Dr. Robert S. Blum, M.D.
Neurosurgeon
1416 Tennessee St.,
Vallejo, CA 94590
Place of the crimes ( Crime Scene ) :
300 Hospital Drive,
Vallejo , CA 94589.
Persons with records of the crimes :
1. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
California Attorney General
2. Gail M. Heppell, State Bar No. 84134
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
1300 ' I ' Street , suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento , CA 94244 - 2550
Tel. ( 916 ) 324 - 5336
Fax ( 916 ) 327 - 2247
3. Shane P. Wright
Supervising Investigator - I
Medical Board of California
Enforcement Program
2535 Capitol Oaks Drive , suite 220
Sacramento , CA 95833
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2585
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2591
4. Robert Sherer
Senior Investigator
Medical Board of California
Enforcement Program
2535 Capitol Oaks Drive , suite 220
Sacramento , CA 95833
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2585
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2591
5. Valerie Moore
Associate Analyst
Medical Board of California
Discipline Coordination Unit
2005 Evergreen Street , suite 1200
Sacramento , CA 95815 - 3831
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2639
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2473
6. President Barack Obama
info@barackobama.com
http://stories.barackobama.com/healthcare
7. U.S. Dept. of Justice
oig.hotline@usdoj.gov
hhs.tips@oig.hhs.gov
paffairs@oig.hhs.gov
Doctors Crimes in California are in :
1. www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications By Dr. Lino Dial
2. www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial/californiainjustice
Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications By Dr. Lino Dial
3. Twitter@LinoDial
Facebook@linodial
www.buzz.google.com
www.buzz.gmail.com
http://mail.google.com/mail
http://Discrimination - in - California.blogspot.com
ERRORS in Superior Court, Solano County , California By Dr. Lino
Dial posted in the above websites .
Illegal Crimes in California .
1. The illegal crimes in California committed by Doctors are
documented in writing.
2. These are recorded in the Series Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital
Falsifications or crimes.
3. Part - I
The crime of Dr. Robert S. Blum , M.D.
a California - licensed practicing physician, a Neurosurgeon
in the City of Vallejo , California is recorded as :
Hospital Falsification No. 1.
Dr. Robert S. Blum falsified the hospital patient medical record
of an old lady to get money illegally . The patient was not his.
He was not asked to see the patient. Dr. Blum admitted in
writing that he was never asked to see the old woman .
Dr. Blum sent a bill or charges to the patient for his unwanted,
unsolicited , and unrequested medical services .
The patient refused to pay .
Question :
Why would a Doctor falsify a Hospital Patient Medical Record
to get money ?
4. Part - II
Illegal or fraudulent investigation of Dr. Lino Dial instead of Dr. Blum .
The old lady was the patient of Dr. Dial. Dr. Blum was never
asked to see the patient .
The fraudulent investigation of Dr. Lino Dial forms Part - II
of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications ,
specifically these are listed as :
Hospital Falsification No. 2
Hospital Falsification No. 3
Hospital Falsification No. 4
Hospital Falsification No. 5
5. Part - III
Part - III of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications
include fraudulent investigations. specifically these include :
Hospital Falsification No. 6
Hospital Falsification No. 7
Hospital Falsification No. 8
Hospital Falsification No. 9
Hospital Falsification No. 10
Hospital Falsification No. 11
Hospital Falsification No. 12
Hospital Falsification No. 13
Question :
Why was the investigation of Dr. Lino Dial illegal or a fraud ?
Evidence :
The most glaring and conspicuous evidence that the investiga-
tion of Dr. Lino Dial was illegal and a fraud is that the
hospital supposedly had or received reports of the so - called
investigations .
The Hospital and Medical Staff told lies , deceits , frauds
and falsehoods because during the Judicial Hearing about
the investigation of Dr. Dial , Physician and doctors made
reports of the investigations. These are recorded in the
100 - page transcript of the Judicial hearing.
Question :
How could a patient be admitted to the hospital , and a
Doctor make a report when the same patient was in the
Cemetery and had been dead for a year ?
This is similar to a dead voter .
The patient was not even at the Hospital at the time of
investigation . The reports of these Doctors are frauds .
The investigation was a fraud and illegal .
Do you think the Hospital , the Medical Staff ,
their Attorney, the Physicians and Doctors who committed
the crimes and frauds reported these to the Medical Board
of California ?
6. Part - IV of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital
Falsifications includes :
Hospital Falsification No. 14
Hospital Falsification No. 15
Hospital Falsification No. 16 thru 53 .
Hospital Falsification No. 14 .
The crimes of Dr. Peter E. Philbin , M.D. are
presented in this section .
Dr. Philbin is a California - licensed practicing physician .
His specialty is Internal Medicine . He is a Nephrologist .
His crimes are documented on pages 43 , 46 , 47 and
48 of the 100 - page transcript of the Judicial Hearing .
Dr. Philbin told lies , deceits and frauds while under Oath
on the Witness stand during the Judicial Hearing .
I saw Dr. Philbin when he took oath to tell the truth .
I heard Dr. Philbin when he spoke lies , deceits and frauds .
The other Physicians and Doctors who were present at
that Judicial Hearing also saw and heard Dr. Philbin .
The statements of Dr. Philbin were proven false beyond
any reasonable doubt during the hearing .
Here is the best part :
The Hospital and Board of Directors claimed in writing
that the Judicial Hearing never took place because I
supposedly canceled it.
But I was present at that hearing .
7. Hospital Falsification No. 15 .
The illegal crimes of Dr. Leonard Brant , M.D. are
presented in this section .
This is included in the Ten Crimes of Dr. Leonard
Brant in the Superior Court of Solano County, California.
Case No. 87291
These are recorded , documented , covered up , stashed ,
conveniently tucked away , pushed aside , shrouded , ignored,
overlooked and disregarded in the Superior Court of
Solano County , California which is located at :
1. Hall of Justice
600 Union Avenue ,
Fairfield , CA 94533
Tel. ( 707 ) 421 - 7827
Fax ( 707 ) 421 - 7817
2. Law and Justice Building
530 Union Avenue ,
Fairfield , CA 94533
Tel. ( 707 ) 421 - 7400
Fax ( 707 ) 421 - 7439
3. Solano Justice Building
321 Tuolumne Street ,
Vallejo , CA 94590
Tel. ( 707 ) 553 - 5367
Fax ( 707 ) 553 - 5661
These are documented by Dr. Lino Dial .
I am Dr. Lino Dial .
I am the victim of their crimes .
Respectfully submitted by :
Dr. Lino Dial
My e-mail : LinoADial2001@yahoo.com
The end .
California Crimes
By Dr. Lino Dial
This is an eye-witness or first - hand report.
Persons who committed the crimes :
1. Dr. Leonard A. Brant, M.D.
Urologist.
Urological Associates Medical Group of San Francisco, CA.
3637 California Street,
San Francisco, CA 94118
2. Dr. Peter E. Philbin, M.D.
Public Health, Internal Medicine, Nephrology
Sonoma Development Center
15000 Arnold Drive,
Sonoma, CA 95476
3. Dr. Robert S. Blum, M.D.
Neurosurgeon
1416 Tennessee St.,
Vallejo, CA 94590
Place of the crimes ( Crime Scene ) :
300 Hospital Drive,
Vallejo , CA 94589.
Persons with records of the crimes :
1. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
California Attorney General
2. Gail M. Heppell, State Bar No. 84134
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
1300 ' I ' Street , suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento , CA 94244 - 2550
Tel. ( 916 ) 324 - 5336
Fax ( 916 ) 327 - 2247
3. Shane P. Wright
Supervising Investigator - I
Medical Board of California
Enforcement Program
2535 Capitol Oaks Drive , suite 220
Sacramento , CA 95833
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2585
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2591
4. Robert Sherer
Senior Investigator
Medical Board of California
Enforcement Program
2535 Capitol Oaks Drive , suite 220
Sacramento , CA 95833
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2585
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2591
5. Valerie Moore
Associate Analyst
Medical Board of California
Discipline Coordination Unit
2005 Evergreen Street , suite 1200
Sacramento , CA 95815 - 3831
Tel. ( 916 ) 263 - 2639
Fax ( 916 ) 263 - 2473
6. President Barack Obama
info@barackobama.com
http://stories.barackobama.com/healthcare
7. U.S. Dept. of Justice
oig.hotline@usdoj.gov
hhs.tips@oig.hhs.gov
paffairs@oig.hhs.gov
Doctors Crimes in California are in :
1. www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial
Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications By Dr. Lino Dial
2. www.googleblog.blogspot.com/LinoDial/californiainjustice
Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications By Dr. Lino Dial
3. Twitter@LinoDial
Facebook@linodial
www.buzz.google.com
www.buzz.gmail.com
http://mail.google.com/mail
http://Discrimination - in - California.blogspot.com
ERRORS in Superior Court, Solano County , California By Dr. Lino
Dial posted in the above websites .
Illegal Crimes in California .
1. The illegal crimes in California committed by Doctors are
documented in writing.
2. These are recorded in the Series Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital
Falsifications or crimes.
3. Part - I
The crime of Dr. Robert S. Blum , M.D.
a California - licensed practicing physician, a Neurosurgeon
in the City of Vallejo , California is recorded as :
Hospital Falsification No. 1.
Dr. Robert S. Blum falsified the hospital patient medical record
of an old lady to get money illegally . The patient was not his.
He was not asked to see the patient. Dr. Blum admitted in
writing that he was never asked to see the old woman .
Dr. Blum sent a bill or charges to the patient for his unwanted,
unsolicited , and unrequested medical services .
The patient refused to pay .
Question :
Why would a Doctor falsify a Hospital Patient Medical Record
to get money ?
4. Part - II
Illegal or fraudulent investigation of Dr. Lino Dial instead of Dr. Blum .
The old lady was the patient of Dr. Dial. Dr. Blum was never
asked to see the patient .
The fraudulent investigation of Dr. Lino Dial forms Part - II
of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications ,
specifically these are listed as :
Hospital Falsification No. 2
Hospital Falsification No. 3
Hospital Falsification No. 4
Hospital Falsification No. 5
5. Part - III
Part - III of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital Falsifications
include fraudulent investigations. specifically these include :
Hospital Falsification No. 6
Hospital Falsification No. 7
Hospital Falsification No. 8
Hospital Falsification No. 9
Hospital Falsification No. 10
Hospital Falsification No. 11
Hospital Falsification No. 12
Hospital Falsification No. 13
Question :
Why was the investigation of Dr. Lino Dial illegal or a fraud ?
Evidence :
The most glaring and conspicuous evidence that the investiga-
tion of Dr. Lino Dial was illegal and a fraud is that the
hospital supposedly had or received reports of the so - called
investigations .
The Hospital and Medical Staff told lies , deceits , frauds
and falsehoods because during the Judicial Hearing about
the investigation of Dr. Dial , Physician and doctors made
reports of the investigations. These are recorded in the
100 - page transcript of the Judicial hearing.
Question :
How could a patient be admitted to the hospital , and a
Doctor make a report when the same patient was in the
Cemetery and had been dead for a year ?
This is similar to a dead voter .
The patient was not even at the Hospital at the time of
investigation . The reports of these Doctors are frauds .
The investigation was a fraud and illegal .
Do you think the Hospital , the Medical Staff ,
their Attorney, the Physicians and Doctors who committed
the crimes and frauds reported these to the Medical Board
of California ?
6. Part - IV of the Series of Fifty - three ( 53 ) Hospital
Falsifications includes :
Hospital Falsification No. 14
Hospital Falsification No. 15
Hospital Falsification No. 16 thru 53 .
Hospital Falsification No. 14 .
The crimes of Dr. Peter E. Philbin , M.D. are
presented in this section .
Dr. Philbin is a California - licensed practicing physician .
His specialty is Internal Medicine . He is a Nephrologist .
His crimes are documented on pages 43 , 46 , 47 and
48 of the 100 - page transcript of the Judicial Hearing .
Dr. Philbin told lies , deceits and frauds while under Oath
on the Witness stand during the Judicial Hearing .
I saw Dr. Philbin when he took oath to tell the truth .
I heard Dr. Philbin when he spoke lies , deceits and frauds .
The other Physicians and Doctors who were present at
that Judicial Hearing also saw and heard Dr. Philbin .
The statements of Dr. Philbin were proven false beyond
any reasonable doubt during the hearing .
Here is the best part :
The Hospital and Board of Directors claimed in writing
that the Judicial Hearing never took place because I
supposedly canceled it.
But I was present at that hearing .
7. Hospital Falsification No. 15 .
The illegal crimes of Dr. Leonard Brant , M.D. are
presented in this section .
This is included in the Ten Crimes of Dr. Leonard
Brant in the Superior Court of Solano County, California.
Case No. 87291
These are recorded , documented , covered up , stashed ,
conveniently tucked away , pushed aside , shrouded , ignored,
overlooked and disregarded in the Superior Court of
Solano County , California which is located at :
1. Hall of Justice
600 Union Avenue ,
Fairfield , CA 94533
Tel. ( 707 ) 421 - 7827
Fax ( 707 ) 421 - 7817
2. Law and Justice Building
530 Union Avenue ,
Fairfield , CA 94533
Tel. ( 707 ) 421 - 7400
Fax ( 707 ) 421 - 7439
3. Solano Justice Building
321 Tuolumne Street ,
Vallejo , CA 94590
Tel. ( 707 ) 553 - 5367
Fax ( 707 ) 553 - 5661
These are documented by Dr. Lino Dial .
I am Dr. Lino Dial .
I am the victim of their crimes .
Respectfully submitted by :
Dr. Lino Dial
My e-mail : LinoADial2001@yahoo.com
The end .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)